Compared to a run-of-the-mill studio of the 80's, I think we're all running $150,000-plus worth of virtual gear, no matter whose software you use. I can generally work as fast as I want and find the Sonar software to have more features than I need. I use Sonar for both orchestral and commercial music, and I have no complaints. What on earth did your parents have in mind naming you that?! From reading these forums for a few days, I already feel a generally more cheerful and inspirational vibe than the ****ing and moaning over at the Cubase forums. Will this method work as well with Sonar as it is with Cubase for me? My samplers (Kontakt) reside on several "server" computers via FX-Teleport.
I use Kontakt with EWQL Symphonic Orchstra. How many people here are composing orchestral works or composing to film or video in Sonar? I also thought that most orchestral and film composers on PC used Cubase over Sonar.Ĭan you help me dispell some of these myths. With my research into Sonar, I'm beginning to think that I am way off with that assumption. It has been my understanding that Sonar is more geared toward song writing and beat creation. I also compose a lot of orchestral pieces. My main work is film composing and commercials. Like several others (many?) around here, I'm considering the switch from Cubase to Sonar6 Producer. Sonar for film scoring / Orchestra composing - How well does it work?
0 kommentar(er)
